This is also one of the tricky question and can be explained
with help of one small case study.
“If an employee who join in an establishment as a trainee
(and not an apprentice as per Apprentices Act, 1961) and after completing of
training that employee treats as probationer. Now in this case, if said
employee resigned from the services and if he did not completes five years of
services but if his training period is included in total year of his service,
then he completes five years of service, then in that scenario what will be the
status of that said employee’s gratuity payment?”
To answer this we will take reference of one of the decided
case of Orissa High Court in which it has mentioned that, a trainee is
different from Apprentice. According to this decision a trainee employed under
contract of employment is not an apprentice under the Apprentice Act, 1961.
Therefore, the exclusion is applicable only to Apprentice appointed under the
Apprentice Act, 1961. In other cases the training period is to be included.
To get the supporting case law for this do write us on girishvivalkar979@gmail.com
Hope this small write up will give insight about pertained
subject.
IMPORTANT:
Information in this blog is being provided as-is without any
warranty/guarantee of any kind.
This blog is intended to provide information only. If you
are seeking advice on any matters relating to information on this blog, you
should – where appropriate – contact us directly at girishvivalkar979@gmail.com
with your specific query or seek advice from qualified professional people.
We encourage you to take steps to obtain the most up-to-date
information and to confirm the accuracy and reliability of any information on
this blog in general by directly communicating with us.
No comments:
Post a Comment