As per sub clause (c) of section 2(oo) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 the expression “continued ill-health” does not mean uninterrupted
continued ill-health but what it means ill-health for considerable period and
long duration affecting normal discharge of duties. It must have a bearing on
the normal discharge of duties.
What is to be seen is whether the workman does
not possess good health for a considerable long period and that has affected
him from active duties.
To note further
this issue has been discussed in one of the decided case of Mumbai High Court
in year 2005.
To get the supporting case law for this do write us on
girishvivalkar979@gmail.com
Hope this small write up will give insight about pertained
subject.
IMPORTANT:
Information in this blog is being provided as-is without any
warranty/guarantee of any kind.
This blog is intended to provide information only. If you
are seeking advice on any matters relating to information on this blog, you
should – where appropriate – contact us directly at girishvivalkar979@gmail.com
with your specific query or seek advice from qualified professional people.
We encourage you to take steps to obtain the most up-to-date
information and to confirm the accuracy and reliability of any information on
this blog in general by directly communicating with us.