This question is bit difficult in general. But, as per legal
perspective concerned, the burden of proof for having worked for 240 days
continuously in the preceding 12 months lies upon the workman/employee.
This is because; it is for workmen and not for the employer
to prove, by evidence, that they had completed 240 days service in the
preceding one year.
To get the supporting case laws for this do write us on juristicsolution@gmail.com
IMPORTANT:
Information in this blog is being provided as-is without any
warranty/guarantee of any kind.
This blog is intended to provide information only. If you
are seeking advice on any matters relating to information on this blog, you
should – where appropriate – contact us directly at juristicsolution@gmail.com
with your specific query or seek advice from qualified professional people.
We encourage you to take steps to obtain the most up-to-date
information and to confirm the accuracy and reliability of any information on
this blog in general by directly communicating with us.
No comments:
Post a Comment