On whom the burden lies to prove for working 240 days in any establishment?

This question is bit difficult in general. But, as per legal perspective concerned, the burden of proof for having worked for 240 days continuously in the preceding 12 months lies upon the workman/employee.

This is because; it is for workmen and not for the employer to prove, by evidence, that they had completed 240 days service in the preceding one year.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
To get the supporting case laws for this do write us on juristicsolution@gmail.com

IMPORTANT:

Information in this blog is being provided as-is without any warranty/guarantee of any kind.

This blog is intended to provide information only. If you are seeking advice on any matters relating to information on this blog, you should – where appropriate – contact us directly at juristicsolution@gmail.com with your specific query or seek advice from qualified professional people.



We encourage you to take steps to obtain the most up-to-date information and to confirm the accuracy and reliability of any information on this blog in general by directly communicating with us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Format of FORM X- Identity Card under rule 57 of Maharashtra Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules

Format of Form A - Register of HRA (House Rent Allowance) under Rule 4

Format of Rule 62 notices of minimum rate of wages fixed for the workmen at the site under CLRA Act

Knowledge archive

Show more

Labels

Show more